##  [Can a corporate director be declared bankrupt? The organisation criterion unravelled.](/en/blog/can-corporate-director-be-declared-bankrupt-organisation-criterion-unravelled) 

#  Can a corporate director be declared bankrupt? The organisation criterion unravelled. 

 

18 January 2024

 

 [Back to insights](javascript:window.history.back();) 

 



      ![vennootschapsbestuurder failliet](/sites/default/files/styles/full_width_in_container_xl/public/2026-10/2_1.jpg.webp?itok=KZRPvbUe "vennootschapsbestuurder failliet") 

 



4 min 

 

 

 



 

 

##  Director as personal guarantor for company. 

 

Suppose a company goes bankrupt and the director personally guaranteed the company. Is this director also himself a company that can be declared bankrupt, separate from the company in failure?

It is an issue that provokes considerable debate in the Belgian legal landscape, especially in bankruptcy cases.  
Yusto lawyer and bankruptcy trustee Dorien Avaux set the stage for a similar case in 2023 and points to the importance of the organisation criterion from the Court of Cassation case law. "The judgment of the Court of Cassation of 18 March 2022 sets out the outline, for the concrete interpretation it is up to the corporate courts."



 

 

 

 



 

       ![vennootschapsbestuurder failliet](/sites/default/files/styles/50_width_xl/public/2026-10/1_0.jpg.webp?itok=AbAns0sI "vennootschapsbestuurder failliet") 

 



 

 

"A very common situation," states Dorien. "Banks want to establish as many guarantees as possible so that they are protected when a company is in financial difficulty. Specifically, this concerned a clothing shop that was heading for bankruptcy. The bank wanted to recover from the director via the guarantee, but the lady in question in turn filed for personal bankruptcy, to arm herself against the bank's claims."



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

### The organisation criterion according to the Supreme Court 18 March 2022

As the case took place before the new insolvency law came into force, the director himself filed a formal application to obtain the waiver. The bank filed a third-party objection to this. It held that the lady could not be considered a company within the meaning of Article I.1, paragraph 1, 1° of the Economic Law Code (WER) and therefore not a bankrupt. Dorien explains.

"Article I.1, first paragraph, 1° of the WER states that a natural person can qualify as an undertaking if it independently carries out a professional activity. If we test this article against the relevant case law and legal doctrine, the Supreme Court ruling of 18 March 2022 plays a key role. This cassation judgment states very clearly that a natural person can be considered an undertaking if it demonstrates that it constitutes an organisation consisting of all its own material, financial or human resources brought together for the purpose of exercising an independent professional activity."

In its opposition, the bank refers to this organisational criterion and argues that the director is not an undertaking because it does not have its own distinct organisation. However, the Brussels Enterprise Court ruled otherwise and confirmed that the director does meet the organisational criterion. Dorien explains the court's reasoning.

"Specifically, the case handler had paid social security contributions as a self-employed person and took a director's salary, thereby receiving a full income. In doing so, the court clarified that the lady did not have to be registered in the CBE. An additional argument is that by entering into the personal guarantee, she also bore the business risk. Moreover, she had a mobile phone, computer and office. From the totality of these elements, the court decided that there is a minimum of own organisation, in line with the Supreme Court's interpretation."



 

 

 

 



 

### Court of Cassation 9 February and 23 November 2023: the organisation criterion lives on

The Brussels Enterprise Court thus follows the reasoning of the Court of Cassation in this case. Nevertheless, the organizational criterion is not free of controversy.

"Several authors criticize the fact that the Court of Cassation adds an additional condition to the legal criterion. Nevertheless, the Court confirms its case law in subsequent judgments," Dorien says. The cassation judgments of Feb. 9 and Nov. 23, 2023, are essential in this regard. On Feb. 9, the Court of Cassation overturned a decision of the Brussels Court of Appeal: in the issue of whether a director was a company, the appellate judges had not examined whether there was an "organization. The Court of Cassation whistled back the appeals court, confirming the importance of the organization criterion. That view was recently confirmed in a cassation judgment of Nov. 23, 2023.

Thus, the organizational criterion remains in force, although it is uncertain how this condition will evolve in the future. According to Dorien, the concrete interpretation of the concept depends on the actual assessment of the corporate courts.



 

 

 

 



 

       ![vennootschapsbestuurder failliet](/sites/default/files/styles/50_width_xl/public/2026-10/2_1.jpg.webp?itok=L8tadkmB "vennootschapsbestuurder failliet") 

 



 

 

"They will verify on a case-by-case basis whether or not the condition is met. This may give rise to uncertainty and location-dependent interpretations, with different interpretations in Brussels or Antwerp, for example. Another question that arises is to what extent banks are still inclined to grant loans to companies with the manager as guarantor. What security do they have now that these guarantees are more and more easily eroded? The future will tell."



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

### Yusto, partner for preventive first-line legal advice

Thus, whether a corporate director qualifies as a corporation and can therefore go bankrupt depends on a factual assessment. As an entrepreneur, do you want to be sure of your piece, for example when entering into (credit) contracts? Preventive advice from a corporate law attorney offers long-term peace of mind.

"Small print often has a big impact, especially when a business gets into turbulent waters," says Dorien. "Take, for example, a cash loan with surety: these are usually very expensive forms of financing, the debt of which becomes due in full in the event of bankruptcy. On the other hand, interesting protection mechanisms, such as the declaration of the unseizability of the family home, are still underused in practice. At Yusto, we place enormous emphasis on prevention. By proactively getting around the table and going through all the scenarios, we avoid dramas afterwards and help entrepreneurs move forward in a targeted way."



 

 

 

 



 

 

       ![](/sites/default/files/styles/50_width_in_container_max/public/2026-08/wit_20260623_142643web.jpg.webp?itok=afdf0Jok)  

## About Dorien Avaux

Dorien Avaux brings together years of experience in construction, corporate, lease, and insolvency law. She advises and represents business owners and individuals, and also serves as a trustee at the Dutch-language Commercial Court in Brussels.

Her approach is personal and well-considered. Dorien takes the time to thoroughly familiarize herself with each case and tailors her advice directly to the client’s needs. This results in a clear course of action, grounded in experience, consultation, and a keen understanding of the situation at hand.

 

 

 

 



 

 



 

CTA Inzichten ontvangen

##  Inzicht ontvangen 

 

Wilt u af en toe een inzicht ontvangen?



 

 

 

 First name  

 Last name  

 

 Company name  

 Email  

 

  I agree to receive other communications from Yusto. 

We care about your privacy. Read how we handle your data in our Privacy Policy.

  

 

 Thank you for signing up! We have received your details and will contact you shortly.

 

 

 

 ![Yusto. Voor ondernemers, familiale bedrijven en investeerders. Voor mensen die bouwen aan iets dat blijft.](/sites/default/files/2026-08/voor_wie.png "Yusto. Voor ondernemers, familiale bedrijven en investeerders. Voor mensen die bouwen aan iets dat blijft.")